Reduced Retinal Blood Vessel Densities Measured by Optical Coherence Tomography Angiography in Keratoconus Patients Are Negatively Correlated with Keratoconus Severity.

Keratoconus (KC) is the most common corneal ectasia. Optical coherence tomography angiography (OCT-A) is a relatively new non-invasive imaging technique that allows the visualization and quantification of retinal and choriocapillary blood vessels. The aim of this study is to assess retinal and choriocapillary vessel density (VD) differences between KC patients and healthy controls and to investigate correlations between VD and KC severity. Fifty-two eyes were included in this exploratory study: twenty-six eyes from 26 KC patients and twenty-six eyes from 26 age- and gender-matched healthy controls. All patients underwent Scheimpflug corneal topography with Pentacam, axis lengths measurement and optical coherence tomography angiography (OCT-A). The thinnest spot in corneal pachymetry, maximum K (Kmax) and KC severity indices from the Belin/Ambrósio enhanced ectasia display (BAD) were also assessed. There was a distinct reduction particularly in the retinal VD of the superficial capillary plexus (SCP). Correlation analyses showed strong and moderate negative correlations between the VD in the macular SCP and BAD KC scores and between the SCP VD and Kmax. There was no difference in retinal thickness between the KC and healthy controls. With this study, further evidence for altered VD measurements by OCT-A in KC patients is given. For the first time, we demonstrated negative correlations between BAD KC scores and retinal blood vessel alterations. A major limitation of the study is the relatively small sample size. Since an artefactual reduction of the quantitative OCT-A measurements due to irregular corneal topography in KC must be assumed, it remains to be investigated whether there are also actual changes in the retinal microcirculation in KC.

Preoperative Evaluation of White Cataracts with the Pentacam.

PURPOSE: To evaluate the use of the Pentacam to analyse the presence or absence of fluid pockets under the anterior capsule and their significance in terms of surgical management and prevention of complications. SETTINGS: Abant Izzet Baysal University Hospital, Bolu, Turkey DESIGN: Randomized, masked, prospective design METHODS: 60 patients with mature cataracts underwent standard phacoemulsification (Phaco) and intraocular lens (IOL) implantation. Patients were divided into 3 groups. Group 1 underwent Phaco+IOL implantation without imaging by Pentacam. Group 2 had fluid detected in Pentacam imaging before the operation and underwent Phaco+IOL implantation with Brazilian method. Group 3 had no fluid detected in Pentacam imaging before the operation and underwent standart Phaco+IOL implantation operation. RESULTS: When the complication rates of 3 different groups were examined separately, they were found to be 15 % in group 1; 5 % in group 2 and 5 % in group 3, respectively. When compared in pairs as Group 1-2, 1-3, and 2-3, respectively (p < 0.01), (p < 0.01), (p > 0.05). The nuclear density of Group 2 and Group 3 was measured, resulting in 30.2 % and 29.6 %, respectively (P = 0.614). Lens thickness, patients with fluid (+) had a thickness of 5.35 mm, while patients with fluid (-) had a thickness of 3.96 mm (p < 0.05). CONCLUSION: Patients who are not imaged with pentacam before surgery experience more complications than other groups because the presence of fluid is unknown. Central lens thickness was higher in patients with fluid, and there was no significant difference in nuclear density between the groups with and without fluid. Pentacam can show the presence of supcapsular fluid and we recommend that imaging tools be more widely used in cataract surgery. We think that this will enable surgeons to make a more accurate surgical planning and reduce the risk of complications.

Correlational Analysis of the Effective Optical Zone with Myopia, Myopic Astigmatism, and Spherical Equivalent in LASIK, PRK, and SMILE.

Purpose: We assess the relationship between preoperative myopic sphere, astigmatism, and spherical equivalent and effective optical zone (EOZ) size, shape, and decentration within individual populations of post-LASIK, PRK, and SMILE patients. Patients and Methods: A retrospective chart review was conducted with 118 LASIK, 144 PRK, and 41 SMILE eyes from 179 total patients that underwent compound myopic ablation. One-year postoperative Pentacam tangential difference maps were used for EOZ data measurements. Correlational analysis between compound myopic measures [sphere, cylinder, manifest refractive spherical equivalent (MRSE)] and EOZ parameters was performed, and differences between groups of myopic sphere and cylinder within each surgery type were assessed. Results: An increase in absolute myopic sphere (and subsequent MRSE) is associated with a smaller EOZ area in SMILE (r=0.454, p=0.003) and a more circular EOZ shape in LASIK (r=0.396, p<0.001) and PRK (r=0.563, p<0.001). An increase in absolute myopic cylinder is associated with an increased EOZ area in all three surgery types [LASIK (r=-0.459, p<0.001), PRK (r=-0.716, p<0.001), SMILE (r=-0.429, p=0.005)] and a more elliptical EOZ in LASIK (r=-0.491, p<0.001) and PRK (r=-0.538, p<0.001). Conclusion: While astigmatism may be correlated to EOZ size within all three refractive surgery types, myopic sphere alone is insufficient to estimate EOZ size differences for procedures with a large blend zone of ablation like LASIK or PRK. Shape is just as important a factor as size to consider when examining corneal EOZ differences; reported correlative findings likely result from inherent differences in surgical technique and abruptness of planned surgical ablation borders.

A comparative study of pupil offset measurement using Pentacam and Keratron Scout in myopic young adults.

CLINICAL RELEVANCE: Assessing the consistency of pupil offset measurements between the Pentacam and Keratron Scout is essential for the refractive surgery design of young myopic patients. BACKGROUND: Accurate preoperative measurement of pupil offset is critical to achieving a better quality of vision after refractive surgery. The Pentacam and Keratron Scout are commonly used in hospitals, and evaluating their consistency is essential for accurate measurement of pupil offset. METHODS: Six hundred eyes (600 subjects) were included in this study. Pupil offset and its X, Y-component were measured by Pentacam and Keratron Scout, respectively. Agreement and repeatability between the two devices were identified by intraclass correlation coefficient and Bland-Altman plots with 95% limits of agreement. Paired t-tests and Pearson analysis were used to compare the differences and correlations between the two devices. RESULTS: The mean age of all subjects was 23 ± 5 years. The mean pupil offset magnitude obtained from Pentacam and Keratron Scout was 0.16 ± 0.08 mm and 0.15 ± 0.07 mm. The 95% limits of agreement (-0.11-0.13, -0.09-0.11, and -0.11-0.12) and intraclass correlation coefficient (0.82, 0.84, and 0.81) demonstrated good agreement and repeatability of the two devices in measuring pupil offset and its X, Y-component. A significant correlation between the two devices was found (r = 0.71, 0.73, and 0.70). The direction of pupil offset measured by the devices was both predominately towards the superonasal quadrant. CONCLUSION: Pentacam and Keratron Scout showed good agreement in measuring pupil offset and its X, Y-component, which can be used interchangeably in clinical practice.

Comparisons of biometric parameters measurements by OPD-SCAN â ¢ and Pentacam in cataract.

BACKGROUND: Comparison of OPD-Scan III and Pentacam measurements of relevant parameters guiding the selection of multifocal intraocular lenses in cataract patients. METHODS: A retrospective study included 120 patients (120 eyes) with cataract. Their chord kappa, chord alpha, corneal spherical aberration, and pupil size were measured by OPD-Scan Ⅲ and Pentacam. Pairwise t-tests, Pearson tests, and Bland-Altman analyses were used, respectively, to assess the difference, correlation, and agreement between the devices. RESULTS: There was no significant difference in photopic chord kappa and corneal spherical aberration between the two instruments (P = 0.054, P = 0.065). Chord alpha and pupil size varied significantly between the two instruments (P < 0.001). OPD-Scan III results revealed a significant association between photopic chord kappa and mesopic chord kappa (r = 0.823, P < 0.001). There was a significant positive correlation between photopic and mesopic chord kappa measured by OPD-Scan Ⅲ and chord kappa measured by Pentacam (r = 0.840, r  = 0.757, P < 0.001). The chord alpha evaluated by the two tools had a moderate correlation (r = 0.442, P < 0.001) between them. Bland-Altman analysis showed that there was excellent agreement between the two instruments in measuring chord kappa and corneal spherical aberration, while the chord alpha and pupil size were not consistent. CONCLUSIONS: The chord kappa and corneal spherical aberration measured by OPD-Scan III and Pentacam were consistent in the preoperative decision making of multifocal intraocular lens implantation in cataract patients, both of which have clinical guiding significance. In addition, OPD-Scan III provides more comprehensive day and night chord kappa and pupil diameters, which improves clinical advice for patients with complicated ocular diseases and high demands for nocturnal vision.

Angle Kappa and angle Alpha agreement between Pentacam Scheimpflug system, swept source optical coherence tomography and ray-tracing aberrometry.

PURPOSE: To compare the consistency of Pentacam Scheimpflug system (Pentacam® HR), ray-tracing aberrometry (iTrace), and swept source optical coherence tomography (IOLMaster 700) measurements for Angle Kappa and angle Alpha. METHODS: A prospective randomized cohort study. 86 individuals (86 eyes) aged 19-45 years with best corrected vision of 4.9 or better were randomly selected from January 2022 to December 2022 in a tertiary-level hospital. Angle Kappa and angle Alpha were measured or calculated using Pentacam, iTrace, and IOLMaster 700, respectively. RESULTS: The mean difference of angle Kappa between any two instruments was not statistically significant, but the mean difference of angle Alpha between both Pentacam and iTrace, Pentacam and IOLMaster 700, and iTrace and IOLMaster 700 was statistically significant (p value <0.001, 0.003, <0.001). The highest consistency of angle Kappa and the narrowest 95% LoA (-0.20 to 0.21) were found between Pentacam and iTrace according to Bland Altman plots, but between Pentacam and IOLMaster 700 according to Mountain plots. Both Bland Altman plots and Mountain plots showed the highest consistency of angle Alpha and the narrowest 95% LoA (-0.14 to 0.24) between Pentacam and iTrace. CONCLUSION: The mean angle Kappa among Pentacam® HR, iTrace, and IOLMaster 700 had good agreement, and the value of angle Kappa could be output directly, making it more convenient for clinical application. The measured or calculated angle Alpha had poor agreement, and ophthalmologists could refer to measurements from multiple instruments.

Comparison of corneal measurements in keratoconus eyes with two swept-source-optical coherence tomography devices and a Scheimpflug device.

PURPOSE: To assess the feasibility and reliability of biometric measurements taken with the Eyestar 900 device in keratoconus eyes in comparison with those taken with the Pentacam HR and IOLMaster 700. METHODS: Seventy-five eyes of 75 patients with keratoconus were included. The central corneal thickness (CCT), thinnest point of corneal thickness (TCT), axial length (AL), flat (K1) and steep (K2) anterior and posterior (Kp1, Kp2) keratometry, maximal keratometry (KMax) and anterior chamber depth (ACD) were compared between the Eyestar 900, Pentacam HR and IOLMaster 700. Reliability parameters such as the coefficient of variation (CoV) and intraclass correlation coefficient (ICC) were calculated. Pearson's r was determined to assess the correlation between devices. RESULTS: A high repeatability (CoV < 1%) and intraclass correlation (ICC > 0.9) was found for all devices, led by AL, TCT, K1 and K2 (CoV 0.01-0.36%; ICC 0.994-1.00). The largest correlation between devices was found for AL (Eyestar vs. IOLMaster, r = 1.0), K1 (Eyestar vs. IOLMaster, r = 0.997) and ACD (Eyestar vs. IOLMaster, r = 0.995; Pentacam vs. IOLMaster, r = 0.987; Eyestar vs. Pentacam, r = 0.983), but there were significant differences in measured values between devices (p < 0.001), whereas the correlation was only slightly lower (r = 0.947 to 0.994) for KMax, CCT, TCT, K2, Kp1 and Kp2. CONCLUSION: Keratometric and axial length measurements with the Eyestar 900 were feasible and revealed a high repeatability and a good correlation to the other devices in eyes with keratoconus.

Illumination levels in commonly used ophthalmic devices.

Pupil diameter is a key parameter for corneal and multifocal intraocular lens surgery. Many devices are dedicated to measure the pupil size, but do not specify the illumination during capture. The aim of this study was to present illumination levels in routinely used ophthalmic devices which present pupil sizes. To obtain measurements, the lux meter was placed in the chin rest in the corneal plane and the room was completely dimmed. Ten measurements were taken for each device. The illumination levels for white and red Placido disk corneal topographers were 1253.1 ± 0.2 and 329.0 ± 0.2 lux, respectively (both photopic conditions). Scheimpflug corneal tomography should be considered as a mesopic measurement (14.5 ± 0.1 lux). Optical coherence tomography and autorefractometry are scotopic measurements (0.4-0.6 lux). We postulate that producers should provide illumination levels of their devices measuring pupil size. Moreover, when mentioning a pupil size, one should consider presenting to what lighting conditions it refers to.

Comparison of two swept-source optical coherence tomography devices, a Scheimpflug camera system and a ray-tracing aberrometer in the measurement of corneal power in patients with cataract.

PURPOSE: To assess the differences and similarities in the corneal curvature obtained by two swept-source optical coherence tomography (SS-OCT) devices, Scheimpflug imaging system and one ray tracing aberrometer in patients with cataracts. Moreover, this study aimed to compare the differences in posterior corneal (PK), total corneal (TK) and true net power (TNP) measurements among the IOLMaster 700, CASIA2, and Pentacam. METHODS: A total of 200 eyes of 200 patients (116 female, 58%) were enrolled in this study, with a mean age of 65.9 ± 9.5 years. The flattest (Kf), steepest (Ks), and mean cornal powers (Km), J0, and J45 were obtained using two SS-OCT-based biometric devices, one rotating camera system and one ray-tracing aberrometer. The PK, TK and TNP values were also measured using these devices. To evaluate the differences and similarities between the devicves, the Friedman test, Pearson correlation coefficient (r), intraclass coefficient correlation (ICC) and Bland‒Altman plots with 95% limits of agreement (LoA) were used, and boxplots and stacked histograms were generated to describe the distributions of the data. RESULTS: There were no significant differences between the IOLMaster 700 and Pentacam for any of the keratometry values. Additionally, there were no significant differences between the IOLMaster 700 and iTrace in evaluating J0 and J45. Bland‒Altman plots revealed relatively wide LoA widths, almost larger than 1 diopter for the keratometry values and almost larger than 0.5 diopter for J0 and J45 values among the four devices. In terms of PK and TK values, significant differences and low ICCs were found among the three devices. CONCLUSIONS: Although strong correlations and good agreement were found among the IOLMaster700, CASIA2, Pentacam and iTrace for Kf, Ks, Km and J0, J45, it seems that the measurements should not be used interchangeably because of the wide LoA widths and the presence of significant differences among the devices. Similarly, due to significant differences and low ICCs, the PK, TK and TNP values obtained by IOLMaster 700, CASIA2, and Pentacam should not be used interchangeably.

Assessment of Preoperative Risk Factors for Post-LASIK Ectasia Development.

Purpose: To evaluate preoperative risk factors (mainly those related to corneal topography/tomography) for post-LASIK ectasia development. Methods: A retrospective case review for post-LASIK ectasia for myopia or myopic astigmatism. The evaluated data included preoperative subjective refraction, method of flap creation, and topometric/tomographic parameters from Oculus Pentacam, including subjective curvature pattern, topometric, elevation, and pachymetric indices from the Belin Ambrosio display "BAD", and the Pentacam Random Forest Index (PRFI). Moreover, preoperative ectasia detection indices were calculated (including Percentage of Tissue Altered "PTA" index, Randleman Ectasia Risk Score System "ERSS", and Navarro Index for Corneal Ectasia "NICE"). Results: Twenty-four eyes of 15 patients were enrolled. Concerning the risk factors, age was lower than 25 in 19 eyes (79%); flaps were created using a microkeratome in 17 eyes (70.8%); thinnest pachymetry was lower than 510µm in eight eyes (33%); total deviation from BAD was higher than 1.6 in 50%; Ambrósio's relational thickness (ART) max was lower than 340 in 45.83%; PTA index was higher than 40% in 16%; ERSS was more than 3 points in 62.5%; NICE was higher than 8 points in three eyes (12.5%); PRFI index was more than 0.125 in 87.5%; two eyes (8%) had no identifiable risk factors. Conclusion: Current ectasia risk assessment criteria were insufficient for detecting a relatively large number of cases. There is an unequivocal need for more information, which may be derived from biomechanical assessment and epithelial thickness mapping. Novel corneal tomography indices derived from artificial intelligence may increase accuracy in characterizing ectasia susceptibility.

Agreements' profile of Scheimpflug-based optical biometer with gold standard partial coherence interferometry.

AIM: To determine the agreement of ocular biometric indices including axial length, keratometric readings, anterior chamber depth, and horizontal corneal diameter between the Pentacam AXL and IOL Master 500. METHODS: The study was a large cross-sectional population-based study (Tehran Geriatric Eye Study) conducted from Jan 2019 to Jan 2020. A total of 160 clusters were randomly selected proportional to size (each cluster contained 20 individuals) from 22 strata of Tehran city. All people aged 60y and above were invited to participate in the study. For all participants, preliminary ocular examinations were performed including the measurement of uncorrected and best-corrected visual acuity, objective and subjective refraction, anterior and posterior segment examinations. All participants underwent an ocular biometry using the Pentacam AXL and IOL Master 500. RESULTS: The 95% limits of agreement (LoA) between the two devices were -0.13 to 0.19, -0.15 to 0.17, and -0.13 to 0.19 in normal, pseudophakic, and cataractous eyes, respectively. With increasing the axial length, the difference between the two devices significantly increased in all three groups of normal, pseudophakic, and cataractous eyes (P<0.001). The 95% LoAs between the two devices regarding the mean keratometry shows that the best LoAs were seen in cataractous (-0.33 to 0.81) and followed by normal eyes (-0.36 to 0.86) and the pseudophakic eyes (-0.48 to 0.90) had the widest LoA. The 95% LoAs for horizontal corneal diameter measurements were -0.08 to 0.86, -0.03 to 0.83, and -0.07 to 0.87 in normal, pseudophakic, and cataractous eyes, respectively. The 95% LoAs of anterior chamber depth measurements between the two devices was -0.39 to 0.19 and -0.37 to 0.13 in normal eyes and cataractous, respectively. CONCLUSION: The Pentacam AXL has excellent agreement with the gold standard, IOL Master 500 in measuring axial length. In eyes with cataracts, the difference between the two devices is more scattered. With the increasing of axial length, the difference between the two devices increased, which should be considered when using Pentacam AXL.

Accuracy of toric intraocular lens calculations using estimated versus measured posterior corneal astigmatism.

PURPOSE: To compare the prediction accuracy of toric intraocular lens calculations using estimated versus measured posterior corneal astigmatism (PCA). DESIGN: Retrospective case series. METHODS: 110 eyes of 110 patients with uncomplicated toric IOL implantation were included in this study. Predicted postoperative refractive astigmatism was calculated with the Barrett Toric calculator using estimated PCA (E-PCA), measured IOLMaster 700 PCA (I-PCA), and measured Pentacam PCA (P-PCA). Refractive astigmatism prediction errors (RA-PE), including their trimmed (tr-) centroid (mean vector), spread (precision), tr-mean absolute RA-PE (accuracy), and percentage within a certain threshold, were determined using vector analysis and compared between groups. SETTING: University Eye Clinic, Maastricht University Medical Center+, the Netherlands. RESULTS: The tr-centroid RA-PEs of the E-PCA (0.02D @ 82.2°), the I-PCA (0.08D @ 35.5°), and the P-PCA (0.09D @ 69.1°) were significantly different from each other (P<0.01), but not significantly different from zero (P=0.75, P=0.05, and P=0.05, respectively). The E-PCA had the best precision (tr-mean 0.40D), which was not significantly lower than the I-PCA (0.42D, P=0.53) and P-PCA (0.43D, P=0.06). The E-PCA also had the best accuracy (0.40D), which was not significantly different from the I-PCA (0.42D, P=0.26) and significantly better than the P-PCA (0.44, P<0.01). The precision and accuracy of the I-PCA did not significantly differ from those of the P-PCA. There were no statistically significant differences in the percentage of eyes within a certain absolute RA-PE threshold. CONCLUSIONS: The Barrett Toric calculator using the E-PCA, I-PCA, or P-PCA showed a comparable prediction of postoperative refractive astigmatism in standard clinical practice.

Comparison of corneal and lens density measurements obtained by Pentacam and CASIA2 in myopes.

PURPOSE: To investigate the agreement between Pentacam and CASIA2 in the evaluation of corneal densities (CDs) and lens densities (LDs) in myopes. METHODS: Fifty-three patients (106 eyes) underwent comprehensive ophthalmologic examinations. CDs and LDs were measured using Pentacam and CASIA2, respectively, based on the grayscale percentage of the obtained images. Agreement between Pentacam and CASIA2 was evaluated using the consistency intraclass correlation coefficient (ICC) and represented using Bland-Altman plots. RESULTS: Compared to Pentacam, CASIA2 showed significantly higher CD and LD values in all measured zones. The ICC of the average CD and LD measured by the Pentacam and CASIA2 were 0.726 and 0.757, respectively. The ICC values of all corneal zones and lenses were above 0.7, except for the measurement of the cornea in the 0-2 mm zone (0.455), suggesting good consistency between the two devices, whose results were of different levels of linear correlation. Bland-Altman plots showed mean percentages of 3.93% for the points falling outside the limits of agreement among the densitometry results. The ICCs in different age groups were similar, but the agreement was poorer in the high myopia group (low and moderate myopia, CD: 0.739, LD: 0.753; high myopia, CD: 0.621, LD: 0.760). CONCLUSIONS: CASIA2 demonstrated good consistency with Pentacam in the measurement of CD and LD, except for measurement of CD in the central cornea and in high myopia. Despite difference in the numerical results compared with Pentacam, which made the two devices uninterchangeable, CASIA2 provides a reliable alternative densitometric measurement method.

Evaluation of anterior chamber morphology following scleral buckling with Pentacam.

PURPOSE: To evaluate anterior segment parameter changes following scleral buckling (SB) surgery for rhegmatogenous retinal detachment (RRD) using the Pentacam Scheimpflug system. METHODS: Twenty-eight phakic eyes of 28 patients who underwent SB surgery for RDD were included. The anterior chamber volume (ACV), central anterior chamber depth (CACD), mean anterior chamber angle (ACA) and ACA in a specific position (buckle quadrant), and central corneal thickness (CCT) were evaluated preoperatively and at 1 day, 1 week, and 1 and 3 months postoperatively by an anterior Pentacam Scheimpflug method. RESULTS: The ACV parameters were significantly decreased compared with preoperative levels at 1 day after SB surgery (P = 0.0004), but had no significant differences at 1 week, and 1 and 3 months (P > 0.05). The mean intraocular pressure (IOP) at 1 day was significantly higher than the preoperative level, but no subsequent significant difference was noted between the preoperative IOP and that at 1 week and 1 and 3 months postoperatively (P > 0.05). The CCT at 1 day after surgery increased significantly (P = 0.0122) and subsequently returned to the normal level postoperatively at 1 week and remained stable until 3 months (P > 0.05). The degree of postoperative ACA displayed different changes in the different quadrants and there was a significant increase in the ACA of the buckle quadrants at 1 day (P < 0.0001), 1 week (P = 0.02), and 1 month (P = 0.0266) after surgery, returning to the normal level at 3 months. CONCLUSIONS: The changes of anterior chamber parameters after SB can be demonstrated by Pentacam both objectively and quantitatively. The ACV and CCT changes were mild and resumed their preoperative parameters after 1 week, while the increase of the ACA at the buckle quadrant returned to normal after 3 months. SB surgeries without encircling or conducted with radial buckling might decrease anterior chamber change.

Comparison of errors in ablation depth calculation after myopic femtosecond laser in situ keratomileusis in patients with different degrees of myopia: a prospective study.

BACKGROUND: To investigate the difference between the predicted preoperative corneal ablation depth and the measured ablation depth for femtosecond laser in situ keratomileusis (FS-LASIK) in patients with different degrees of myopia, and to analyze the source of the difference. METHODS: A total of 55 patients (109 eyes) were included in this study. Multiple logistics regression was applied to analyze the sources affecting postoperative refractive outcomes. The difference between the preoperative predicted corneal ablation depth and the 1-day postoperative ablation depth in patients with different degrees of myopia was explored using linear regression. Corneal biomechanical parameters influencing error in ablation depth calculation were examined using multiple linear regression. RESULTS: One hundred and nine eyes were divided into low to moderate myopia (55 eyes, myopia of 6 D or less), high myopia (45 eyes, myopia ranging from 6 D to a maximum of 9 D), and very high myopia group (9 eyes, myopia greater than 9 D) based on preoperative refractive error (spherical equivalent). Postoperative visual outcomes were comparable among the three groups of patients, with no significant difference in uncorrected visual acuity (UCVA). We did find notable disparities in spherical equivalent (SE) and central corneal thickness (CCT) in patients with different degrees of myopia at 1 day postoperatively (all p < 0.001). Logistic regression analysis showed that error in ablation depth calculation was an independent risk factor for refractive outcomes one day after surgery (OR = 1.689, 95% CI: 1.366 - 2.089). There was a substantial discrepancy in error in ablation depth calculation at 1 day postoperatively between the three groups. The measured ablation depth of the laser platform was lower than the predicted ablation depth in the low to moderate myopia and very high myopia groups, but the opposite was true in the high myopia group. Pre-operative SE (p < 0.001) and corneal front minimum radius of curvature (Front Rmin) (p = 0.007) obviously influenced the error in ablation depth calculation. CONCLUSIONS: Error in ablation depth calculation values vary significantly between patients with different degrees of myopia and correlate highly with preoperative SE and Front Rmin. At the same time, the available evidence suggests that error in ablation depth calculation is an influential factor in postoperative refractive status, so it is imperative to control error in ablation depth calculation.

Prediction of posterior elevation stability in keratoconus.

Purpose: This study aimed to investigate the features of progressive keratoconus by means of machine learning. Methods: In total, 163 eyes from 127 patients with at least 3 examination records were enrolled in this study. Pentacam HR was used to measure corneal topography. Steepest meridian keratometry (K1), flattest meridian keratometry (K2), steepest anterior keratometry (Kmax), central corneal thickness (CCT), thinnest corneal thickness (TCT), anterior radius of cornea (ARC), posterior elevation (PE), index of surface variation (ISV), and index of height deviation (IHD) were input for analysis. Support vector machine (SVM) and logistic regression analysis were applied to construct prediction models. Results: Age, PE, and IHD showed statistically significant differences as the follow-up period extended. K2, PE, and ARC were selected for model construction. Logistic regression analysis presented a mean area under the curve (AUC) score of 0.780, while SVM presented a mean AUC of 0.659. The prediction sensitivity of SVM was 52.9%, and specificity was 79.0%. Conclusion: It is feasible to use machine learning to predict the progression and prognosis of keratoconus. Posterior elevation exhibits a sensitive prediction effect.

Revisiting Pentacam Parameters in the Diagnosis of Subclinical and Mild Keratoconus Based on Different Grading System Definitions

Objectives: To retest the performance of Pentacam parameters in the detection of eyes with subclinical keratoconus (KC) and mild KC based on different definitions from the Amsler-Krumeich (AK), Collaborative Longitudinal Evaluation of Keratoconus (CLEK), and ABCD systems. Materials and Methods: This cross-sectional university-based study comprised 24 eyes with subclinical KC, 144 eyes with mild KC (based on AK in 101 eyes, CLEK in 28 eyes, and ABCD in 15 eyes), and 70 controls. Diagnostic ability of the thinnest point (TP) pachymetry, KISA% index, inferior-superior asymmetry, corneal aberrations, Pentacam indices, front/back elevations, pachymetric progression index, Ambrósio-Relational Thickness (ARTmax), and Belin/Ambrósio Enhanced Ectasia Display scores (Df, Db, Dp, Dt, Da, and D-final) were evaluated. Results: ARTmax (83.3% sensitivity/74.3% specificity) had the highest ability in distinguishing subclinical KC from normal, followed by TP pachymetry, Dt, and Da. D-final showed excellent sensitivity/specificity in mild KC diagnosis based on AK (98%/100%) and CLEK (97.4%/100%) descriptions. In the mild KC-ABCD group, index of vertical asymmetry accurately detected all eyes with mild KC and 97.1% of the controls. Conclusion: This study points out the gray zone in the detection of eyes with subclinical and mild KC due to overlapping terminology and grading criteria. Pentacam parameters seem to have modest capability in subclinical KC detection, indicating the necessity for additional diagnostic modalities. However, eyes with mild KC can be diagnosed with high accuracy using Pentacam parameters, although the strongest parameters may vary according to the definition of "mild KC." Nevertheless, uniform and definitive criteria for subclinical and clinical KC classification are required for a diagnostic and therapeutic consensus in KC.

Evaluation of corneal backward light scattering in type 2 diabetes mellitus.

AIM: To compare the corneal backward light scattering values in type 2 diabetes mellitus (DM) patients with those of age and sex-matched healthy controls. METHODS: The study included 30 patients (30 eyes) with type 2 DM and 30 control subjects (30 eyes). Duration of diabetes, most recent hemoglobin A1c levels, along with the status of diabetic retinopathy, and existing medical treatment of all subjects were recorded. All subjects underwent a complete ophthalmologic examination. In addition, backward light scattering (densitometry) was measured to assess changes in corneal transparency using tomography (Pentacam HR). RESULTS: The type 2 DM patients included 12 males and 18 females and control subjects included 16 males and 14 females. The age was 50.40±7.80y (range: 40-68y) of the diabetic group and 49.30±9.50y (rang: 40-73y) of control group. The diabetic group demonstrated significantly higher mean densitometry values of the anterior (6-10 mm) zone (P=0.047), the total anterior layer (P=0.036) and the total cornea (P=0.043) than control group. The corneal densitometry of the diabetic eyes demonstrated no significant correlation with hemoglobin A1c levels and DM duration. CONCLUSION: Diabetic group has higher densitometry in anterior corneal (6-10 mm) zone, total anterior cornea, and total cornea and with no correlation with hemoglobin A1c levels and DM duration.

Corneal topographic indices of scheimpflug camera in type 2 diabetic and non-diabetic elderly populations.

PURPOSE: The present study was conducted to determine the corneal topographic indices of Scheimpflug camera in type 2 diabetes patients without diabetic retinopathy (DR), DR and non-diabetic elderly populations. METHODS: A total of 1105 participants were selected using random cluster sampling from Tehran, Iran and categorized into three groups including type 2 diabetes patients without diabetic retinopathy (DR), DR and non-diabetic. The diabetic group had HbA1c levels ≥ 6.4% with no other systemic problems. The non-diabetic participants had normal eye findings and no systemic diseases. The pachymetric progression index (PPI) values were measured using the Pentacam AXL. RESULTS: A total of 1105 participants including 429 diabetes patients (38.46% male) and 676 non-diabetic (38.76% male) subjects entered the study. Only PPIavg and PPImax were higher in the diabetics versus non-diabetics (P = 0.019 and 0.010, respectively). There was a significant difference in PPImax between the three groups (P = 0.036). There were significant differences only in index of vertical asymmetry (IVA), central keratoconus index (CKI), PPI average, and PPI max between different stages of diabetic retinopathy (DR) (P = 0.045, 0.005, 0.002, and 0.004, respectively). There was a significant difference in index of Surface Variance (ISV), index of vertical asymmetry (IVA), PPIavg, and PPImax between diabetes patients with and without DR (P = 0.016, 0.022, < 0.001, and < 0.001, respectively). CONCLUSION: According to the results, diabetes and DR change several topographic indices. In addition, the HbA1c level may affect pachymetric progression index max. Therefore, special attention should be paid to these patients for different treatment strategies.

Comparison of Intraocular Lens Power Calculation between Standard Partial Coherence Interferometry-Based and Scheimpflug-Based Biometers: The Importance of Lens Constant Optimization.

Purpose: To compare the intraocular lens (IOLs) power calculated with Haigis, Hoffer Q, Holladay 1, and SRK/T formulas between the IOLs Master 500 and Pentacam AXL according to the lens status. Methods: In this cross-sectional study, sampling was done in subjects above 60 years living in Tehran using multi-stage cluster sampling. All participants underwent optometric examinations including the measurement of visual acuity and refraction as well as slit-lamp biomicroscopy to determine the lens status. Biometric measurements and IOLs power calculation were done using the IOL Master 500 and Pentacam AXL. The order of imaging modalities was random in subjects. IOL power calculation was done according to optimized ULIB constants for the Alcon SA60AT lens. The IOL power was calculated according to a target refraction of emmetropia in all subjects. Results: After applying the exclusion criteria, 1865 right eyes were analyzed. The mean IOL difference between the two devices was -0.33 ± 0.35, -0.38 ± 0.39, -0.41 ± 0.43, and -0.51 ± 0.43 according to the SRK/T, Holladay, Hoffer Q, and Haigis formulas, respectively. The Pentacam calculated larger IOL power values in all cases. The 95% limits of agreement (LoA) between the two devices for the above formulas were -1.01 to 0.35, -1.14 to 0.39, -1.25 to 0.43, and -1.35 to 0.33, respectively. The best LoA were observed in normal lenses for all formulas. The difference in the calculated IOL power between the two devices using the four formulas had a significant correlation with axial length, mean keratometry reading, and anterior chamber depth. According to the results of the four formulas, mean keratometry reading had the highest standardized regression coefficient in all formulas. Conclusion: Although the difference in the calculated IOL power between IOL Master 500 and Pentacam AXL is not significant clinically, the results of these two devices are not interchangeable due to the wide LoA, especially for the Haigis formula; therefore, it is necessary to optimize lens constants for the Pentacam.